Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/material-icons/400-24px/chat.svg`:
Glitch-soc used this one but not upstream.
Upstream pulled a presumably more up-to-date version of the file.
Switched to upstream's version.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream removed use of font-awesome.
I hope we are ready.
- `app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml`:
Upstream removed use of font-awesome.
I hope we are ready.
- `app/views/layouts/error.html.haml`:
Upstream removed use of font-awesome.
I hope we are ready.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just upstream adding a method textually adjacent to
glitch-soc only code.
Ported upstream's change.
Packs are now loaded from views, just like upstream, and are
identified by their filenames. The definition of `theme.yml` has
changed as such:
- `pack_directory` is now required
- `pack` is now unused
- `signed_in_preload` has been introduced
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream has updated its README, we have a completely different one.
Kept ours.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Upstream refactored stuff and the conflict is because of glitch-soc's theming
system.
Ported upstream changes while accounting for the different theming system.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream README has been changed, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our `README.md`.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Change the code style to match upstream's but otherwise do not change our
code.
- `spec/lib/sanitize_config_spec.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Kept our version, since the tests are mostly glitch-soc's, except for cases
which are purposefuly different.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/accounts_helper.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/accounts/_header.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/directories/index.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/relationships_controller.rb`:
Upstream changed a line too close to a glitch-soc only line related to
glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes accordingly.
Conflicts:
- `app/serializers/rest/account_serializer.rb`:
Upstream added code too close to glitch-soc-specific followers-hiding code.
Ported upstream changes.
* Return last_status_at as date, not datetime
* Fix relative timestamp for dates when delay is inferior to 1 day
* Also fix public directory
* Fix error when last_status_at isn't set
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream removed an unused function in code that has
been refactored a bit. Removed that function in the corresponding
places.
* Fix unused role routes being generated
* Remove unused JavaScript code
* Refactor filters code to be DRYer
* Fix `.count == 0` comparisons to `.empty?` in views
* Fix filters in views
Before this moment relationships managing page was using strings from
other context - from counters, but in order for translators to be able
to translate it relatively to the page, it must use separate strings.
I've split the strings for "Following" and "Followers" and put them to
"relationships" keyset in localization file. This should solve this
issue.
Fixes#10863
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb
- app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb
- app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb
All conflicts caused by the additional `use_pack` used for glitch-soc's theming
system.
Claire
Matt Jankowski
Jason Punyon
Jeong Arm
Thibaut Girka
Takeshi Umeda
Eugen Rochko
Sasha Sorokin